Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger vs Anker PowerCore 26800mAh Portable Charger (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger

9.2/10 Excellent

4.6★ (28,400 owners)

The world's smallest 65W GaN charger. Folds flat. Charges a MacBook, iPad and iPhone simultaneously.

Full Review

Anker PowerCore 26800mAh Portable Charger

9.0/10 Excellent

4.6★ (64,000 owners)

26,800mAh — charges an iPhone 13 approximately 6 times. Dual USB-A ports. The long-haul travel essential.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger	Anker PowerCore 26800mAh Portable Charger
247Verdict Score	9.2/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (28,400)	4.6★ (64,000)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Warranty	18 months	18 months

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger edges ahead with a 9.2/10 vs 9.0/10. The world's smallest 65W GaN charger. Folds flat. Charges a MacBook, iPad and iPhone simultaneously. That said, the Anker PowerCore 26800mAh Portable Charger is worth considering if 26,800mAh — charges an iPhone 13 approximately 6 times. Dual USB-A ports. The long-haul travel essential. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger

Smallest 65W GaN charger commercially available — genuinely pocketable
Charges MacBook Pro 14" at full speed via USB-C
GaN III technology runs 50% cooler than silicon equivalents
Foldable UK/US plug reduces bag bulk significantly
Charges phone to 50% in 25 minutes via PowerIQ 3.0

Single port — can't charge multiple devices simultaneously on this model
65W won't fully sustain a MacBook Pro 16" under heavy load
Small size means it can block adjacent sockets on extension leads

Anker PowerCore 26800mAh Portable Charger

26,800mAh charges most smartphones 5–6 times from empty
Dual USB-A ports charge two devices simultaneously
Anker's MultiProtect safety covers surge, short-circuit and temperature
Charges itself via included Micro-USB and USB-C
10-year track record of reliability from the most trusted power bank brand

Heavy at 490g — clearly a trip bag item, not a pocket accessory
Micro-USB input is legacy — USB-C-only competitors exist now
Output speed limited vs newer GaN alternatives

FAQ

Which is better, Anker Nano II 65W USB-C or Anker PowerCore 26800mAh?

Is the Anker Nano II 65W USB-C worth the extra cost?

Yes — Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger scores higher at 9.2/10 vs 9.0/10.

Who is the Anker Nano II 65W USB-C best suited to?

The world's smallest 65W GaN charger. Folds flat. Charges a MacBook, iPad and iPhone simultaneously.

Who is the Anker PowerCore 26800mAh best suited to?

26,800mAh — charges an iPhone 13 approximately 6 times. Dual USB-A ports. The long-haul travel essential.

What are the main downsides of each?

Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger: Single port — can't charge multiple devices simultaneously on this model; 65W won't fully sustain a MacBook Pro 16" under heavy load. Anker PowerCore 26800mAh Portable Charger: Heavy at 490g — clearly a trip bag item, not a pocket accessory; Micro-USB input is legacy — USB-C-only competitors exist now.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger sits at 4.6★ from 28,400 verified Amazon owners, and Anker PowerCore 26800mAh Portable Charger at 4.6★ from 64,000.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.