Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K) vs Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)

9.2/10 Excellent

4.7★ (12,400 owners)

24,000mAh, 140W output, smart display, charges laptops, 3 ports. The laptop power bank.

Full Review

Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger

9.2/10 Excellent

4.6★ (28,400 owners)

The world's smallest 65W GaN charger. Folds flat. Charges a MacBook, iPad and iPhone simultaneously.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)	Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger
247Verdict Score	9.2/10	9.2/10
Owner Rating	4.7★ (12,400)	4.6★ (28,400)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Ports	3	1 USB-C

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K): 24,000mAh, 140W output, smart display, charges laptops, 3 ports. The laptop power bank. Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger: The world's smallest 65W GaN charger. Folds flat. Charges a MacBook, iPad and iPhone simultaneously. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)

140W output charges laptops including MacBook Pro 16 — not just phones
24,000mAh capacity provides multiple full phone charges or one full laptop charge
Smart digital display shows exact remaining capacity and charging wattage
Three ports charge laptop, phone and earbuds simultaneously
Anker's reliability reputation backed by 12,400 reviews at 4.7★

Heavy at 630g — significant for everyday pocket carry
Airline carry-on limits — 24,000mAh is near the 100Wh flight threshold
Premium pricing vs basic phone-only power banks

Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger

Smallest 65W GaN charger commercially available — genuinely pocketable
Charges MacBook Pro 14" at full speed via USB-C
GaN III technology runs 50% cooler than silicon equivalents
Foldable UK/US plug reduces bag bulk significantly
Charges phone to 50% in 25 minutes via PowerIQ 3.0

Single port — can't charge multiple devices simultaneously on this model
65W won't fully sustain a MacBook Pro 16" under heavy load
Small size means it can block adjacent sockets on extension leads

FAQ

Which is better, Anker 737 Power Bank or Anker Nano II 65W USB-C?

Is the Anker 737 Power Bank worth the extra cost?

The Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Anker Nano II 65W USB-C best suited to?

24,000mAh, 140W output, smart display, charges laptops, 3 ports. The laptop power bank.

Who is the Anker Nano II 65W USB-C best suited to?

The world's smallest 65W GaN charger. Folds flat. Charges a MacBook, iPad and iPhone simultaneously.

What are the main downsides of each?

Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K): Heavy at 630g — significant for everyday pocket carry; Airline carry-on limits — 24,000mAh is near the 100Wh flight threshold. Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger: Single port — can't charge multiple devices simultaneously on this model; 65W won't fully sustain a MacBook Pro 16" under heavy load.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K) sits at 4.7★ from 12,400 verified Amazon owners, and Anker Nano II 65W USB-C Charger at 4.6★ from 28,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.