Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch vs Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (6,100 owners)

Entry AMOLED Garmin with training readiness and 11-day battery. The beginner's serious GPS watch.

Full Review

Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe

9.1/10 Excellent

4.6★ (8,400 owners)

Contagrip, 3D Advanced Chassis, EnergyCell foam. 25-year trail running benchmark.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch	Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	9.1/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,100)	4.6★ (8,400)
Verdict	Great	Excellent

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.9/10. Contagrip, 3D Advanced Chassis, EnergyCell foam. 25-year trail running benchmark. That said, the Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch is worth considering if Entry AMOLED Garmin with training readiness and 11-day battery. The beginner's serious GPS watch. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch

AMOLED display brings Garmin's best screen to the entry price point
Training Readiness score guides workout intensity without overwhelming beginners
11-day battery in smartwatch mode — matches the more expensive Forerunner 265
GPS accuracy from Garmin's trusted GNSS satellite support
Under £200 brings proper training analytics to budget-conscious runners

Single-band GPS (not dual-band like the 265) — less accurate on technical terrain
No HRV status measurement — only in the Forerunner 265+
Smaller feature set vs Forerunner 265 for structured workouts

Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe

Contagrip outsole is the trail running traction benchmark — 30 years of development
3D Advanced Chassis provides underfoot torsional stability on uneven terrain
EnergyCell foam delivers cushioning and energy return without weight penalty
Quicklace system one-pull tightening with single lock — faster than standard laces
Salomon's 25-year trail running shoe heritage — the original trail shoe brand

Narrower last than New Balance or Hoka alternatives — not suited for wide feet
Higher price than budget trail options — reflects Salomon's engineering investment
Quicklace system replacement is proprietary — not standard shoelace compatible

FAQ

Which is better, Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS or Salomon XA Pro 3D V9?

Is the Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS worth the extra cost?

The Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS best suited to?

Entry AMOLED Garmin with training readiness and 11-day battery. The beginner's serious GPS watch.

Who is the Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 best suited to?

Contagrip, 3D Advanced Chassis, EnergyCell foam. 25-year trail running benchmark.

What are the main downsides of each?

Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch: Single-band GPS (not dual-band like the 265) — less accurate on technical terrain; No HRV status measurement — only in the Forerunner 265+. Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe: Narrower last than New Balance or Hoka alternatives — not suited for wide feet; Higher price than budget trail options — reflects Salomon's engineering investment.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch sits at 4.5★ from 6,100 verified Amazon owners, and Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe at 4.6★ from 8,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.