Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch vs LifeStraw Peak Series Squeeze Filter (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (6,100 owners)

Entry AMOLED Garmin with training readiness and 11-day battery. The beginner's serious GPS watch.

Full Review

LifeStraw Peak Series Squeeze Filter

9.0/10 Excellent

4.6★ (6,400 owners)

0.1 micron hollow fibre, removes bacteria/parasites/microplastics, 1000L lifespan, 80g. Ultralight water filter.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch	LifeStraw Peak Series Squeeze Filter
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,100)	4.6★ (6,400)
Verdict	Great	Excellent

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch: Entry AMOLED Garmin with training readiness and 11-day battery. The beginner's serious GPS watch. LifeStraw Peak Series Squeeze Filter: 0.1 micron hollow fibre, removes bacteria/parasites/microplastics, 1000L lifespan, 80g. Ultralight water filter. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch

AMOLED display brings Garmin's best screen to the entry price point
Training Readiness score guides workout intensity without overwhelming beginners
11-day battery in smartwatch mode — matches the more expensive Forerunner 265
GPS accuracy from Garmin's trusted GNSS satellite support
Under £200 brings proper training analytics to budget-conscious runners

Single-band GPS (not dual-band like the 265) — less accurate on technical terrain
No HRV status measurement — only in the Forerunner 265+
Smaller feature set vs Forerunner 265 for structured workouts

LifeStraw Peak Series Squeeze Filter

0.1 micron hollow fibre removes bacteria, parasites and microplastics — WHO-compliant purification
1,000-litre filter lifespan covers years of weekend hiking and extended expeditions
80g is ultralight — costs nothing to carry 'just in case' on every hike
Squeeze mechanism works without pumping — gravity or squeeze fills bottles from any source
LifeStraw donates a school year of safe water to a child for each filter purchased — ethical dimension

Doesn't remove viruses — Sawyer Squeeze and Katadyn add chemical treatment for viral risk areas
Squeeze mechanism requires practice to use efficiently
Not suitable for murky glacial or silt-heavy water without pre-filtering

FAQ

Which is better, Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS or LifeStraw Peak Series?

Is the Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS worth the extra cost?

The LifeStraw Peak Series Squeeze Filter matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS best suited to?

Entry AMOLED Garmin with training readiness and 11-day battery. The beginner's serious GPS watch.

Who is the LifeStraw Peak Series best suited to?

0.1 micron hollow fibre, removes bacteria/parasites/microplastics, 1000L lifespan, 80g. Ultralight water filter.

What are the main downsides of each?

Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch: Single-band GPS (not dual-band like the 265) — less accurate on technical terrain; No HRV status measurement — only in the Forerunner 265+. LifeStraw Peak Series Squeeze Filter: Doesn't remove viruses — Sawyer Squeeze and Katadyn add chemical treatment for viral risk areas; Squeeze mechanism requires practice to use efficiently.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Garmin Forerunner 165 GPS Running Watch sits at 4.5★ from 6,100 verified Amazon owners, and LifeStraw Peak Series Squeeze Filter at 4.6★ from 6,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.