Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Apple Watch Ultra 2

9.1/10 Excellent

4.6★ (9,800 owners)

Titanium case, dual-band GPS, 60-hour battery, 86dB siren. Apple's extreme sports flagship.

Full Review

Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch

9.2/10 Excellent

4.5★ (8,400 owners)

AMOLED display, dual-band GPS, 13-day battery, HRV status. The serious runner's smart watch.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Apple Watch Ultra 2	Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	9.2/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (9,800)	4.5★ (8,400)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
GPS	Dual-band L1+L5	Dual-band L1+L5
Battery	36hr standard / 60hr low-power	13 days / 20hr GPS
Water	100m	5ATM
Display	49mm always-on OLED	AMOLED 1.3"

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Apple Watch Ultra 2: Titanium case, dual-band GPS, 60-hour battery, 86dB siren. Apple's extreme sports flagship. Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch: AMOLED display, dual-band GPS, 13-day battery, HRV status. The serious runner's smart watch. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Apple Watch Ultra 2

Titanium case with sapphire crystal — genuinely expedition-grade Apple build
Dual-band GPS with L1+L5 — competitive with Garmin for GPS accuracy
60-hour battery in low-power mode — unprecedented for Apple Watch
86dB emergency siren — genuine safety feature for solo outdoor adventures
Seamless iPhone/Apple Health integration — best choice for Apple ecosystem users

Requires iPhone — no Android compatibility
60-hour battery still trails Garmin Fenix 7S Solar for multi-day expeditions
Large 49mm case is distinctive but may not suit all wrists

Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch

AMOLED display is the clearest running watch screen available at this price
Dual-band GPS (L1+L5) delivers within 1% distance accuracy on technical routes
13-day battery in smartwatch mode, 20 hours GPS — enough for ultra-marathon training
Morning Report with HRV status and Body Battery guides daily training intensity
Training Readiness score prevents overtraining by analysing load vs recovery

13-day battery drops to 20 hours in GPS mode — fine for most, limiting for ultramarathon racing
No maps (topo maps are in the Fenix range)
AMOLED reduces battery vs transflective displays in previous Forerunner models

FAQ

Which is better, Apple Watch Ultra 2 or Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS?

Is the Apple Watch Ultra 2 worth the extra cost?

The Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Apple Watch Ultra 2 best suited to?

Titanium case, dual-band GPS, 60-hour battery, 86dB siren. Apple's extreme sports flagship.

Who is the Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS best suited to?

AMOLED display, dual-band GPS, 13-day battery, HRV status. The serious runner's smart watch.

What are the main downsides of each?

Apple Watch Ultra 2: Requires iPhone — no Android compatibility; 60-hour battery still trails Garmin Fenix 7S Solar for multi-day expeditions. Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch: 13-day battery drops to 20 hours in GPS mode — fine for most, limiting for ultramarathon racing; No maps (topo maps are in the Fenix range).

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Apple Watch Ultra 2 sits at 4.6★ from 9,800 verified Amazon owners, and Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch at 4.5★ from 8,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.