247verdict.com earns affiliate commissions on purchases — at no extra cost to you.

Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + Cellular vs Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch (2026)

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + Cellular

Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + Cellular

9.3/10 Excellent

4.7★ (3,800 owners)

Titanium, 60hr battery, dual-frequency GPS, 100m waterproof, Action Button. Apple's sport flagship.

Check Price ↗ Full Review
VS
Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch

Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch

9.2/10 Excellent

4.5★ (8,400 owners)

AMOLED display, dual-band GPS, 13-day battery, HRV status. The serious runner's smart watch.

Check Price ↗ Full Review

At a Glance

Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + CellularGarmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch
247Verdict Score 9.3/10 9.2/10
Owner Rating 4.7★ (3,800) 4.5★ (8,400)
VerdictExcellentExcellent
Battery60 hours13 days / 20hr GPS
GPSDual-frequency L1+L5Dual-band L1+L5
Water100m5ATM
DisplayBrightestAMOLED 1.3"

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + Cellular: Titanium, 60hr battery, dual-frequency GPS, 100m waterproof, Action Button. Apple's sport flagship.. Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch: AMOLED display, dual-band GPS, 13-day battery, HRV status. The serious runner's smart watch.. Choose based on your specific needs.

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + Cellular

  • 60-hour battery in low-power mode for ultra marathons
  • Dual-frequency GPS L1+L5 most accurate Apple Watch
  • 100-metre water resistance for ocean and cliff diving
  • Action Button customisable for gloved use
  • Brightest Apple Watch display in sunlight
  • £799 — most expensive Apple Watch, iPhone only
  • Garmin Fenix 8 Solar has indefinite solar battery
  • Not for Android users

Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch

  • AMOLED display is the clearest running watch screen available at this price
  • Dual-band GPS (L1+L5) delivers within 1% distance accuracy on technical routes
  • 13-day battery in smartwatch mode, 20 hours GPS — enough for ultra-marathon training
  • Morning Report with HRV status and Body Battery guides daily training intensity
  • Training Readiness score prevents overtraining by analysing load vs recovery
  • 13-day battery drops to 20 hours in GPS mode — fine for most, limiting for ultramarathon racing
  • No maps (topo maps are in the Fenix range)
  • AMOLED reduces battery vs transflective displays in previous Forerunner models

FAQ

Which is better, Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + Cellular or Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS?

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + Cellular: Titanium, 60hr battery, dual-frequency GPS, 100m waterproof, Action Button. Apple's sport flagship.. Garmin Forerunner 265 GPS Running Watch: AMOLED display, dual-band GPS, 13-day battery, HRV status. The serious runner's smart watch.. Choose based on your specific needs.

Is the Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + Cellular worth the extra cost?

Yes — Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS + Cellular scores higher at 9.3/10 vs 9.2/10.

Also Worth Considering

Garmin Fenix 7S Pro Solar GPS Watch

Garmin Fenix 7S Pro Solar GPS Watch

9.4/10
4.6★ (5,600)

Solar charging, full topo maps, 37-day battery, titanium bezel. The expedition multisport standard.

Check Price ↗ Full Review
Garmin Fēnix 8 Solar Sapphire GPS Watch

Garmin Fēnix 8 Solar Sapphire GPS Watch

9.3/10
4.5★ (3,200)

Sapphire, solar, 29-day battery, built-in speaker, scuba diving, multiband GPS. Garmin's flagship outdoor watch.

Check Price ↗ Full Review
Garmin Forerunner 955 Solar GPS Watch

Garmin Forerunner 955 Solar GPS Watch

9.3/10
4.6★ (4,800)

Solar, triathlon, 20-day battery, multiband GPS, ClimbPro, PacePro. The triathlete's watch.

Check Price ↗ Full Review

Related Comparisons