Adidas Ultraboost 23 Running Shoes vs Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Adidas Ultraboost 23 Running Shoes

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (12,400 owners)

Boost midsole, Primeknit+ upper, Linear Energy Push, 11mm drop. Energy-return road runner.

Full Review

Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe

9.1/10 Excellent

4.6★ (8,400 owners)

Contagrip, 3D Advanced Chassis, EnergyCell foam. 25-year trail running benchmark.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Adidas Ultraboost 23 Running Shoes	Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	9.1/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (12,400)	4.6★ (8,400)
Verdict	Excellent	Excellent
Foam	Boost (energy return)	EnergyCell
Drop	11mm	10mm

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Adidas Ultraboost 23 Running Shoes: Boost midsole, Primeknit+ upper, Linear Energy Push, 11mm drop. Energy-return road runner. Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe: Contagrip, 3D Advanced Chassis, EnergyCell foam. 25-year trail running benchmark. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Adidas Ultraboost 23 Running Shoes

Boost midsole is the original energy-return foam that influenced every subsequent running shoe foam
Primeknit+ upper is breathable and adapts to foot shape without pressure points
Linear Energy Push plate guides the foot through efficient toe-off geometry
12,400 Amazon reviews at 4.5★ from runners who've tested Ultraboost over multiple generations
Adidas's running shoe engineering applied to the lifestyle-to-performance crossover shoe

Less maximal cushioning than Hoka Clifton — not ideal for high-mileage easy running
SPEEDROLL alternatives like Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 are faster for tempo work
Premium pricing at £150+ for a shoe that sells as much on style as performance

Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe

Contagrip outsole is the trail running traction benchmark — 30 years of development
3D Advanced Chassis provides underfoot torsional stability on uneven terrain
EnergyCell foam delivers cushioning and energy return without weight penalty
Quicklace system one-pull tightening with single lock — faster than standard laces
Salomon's 25-year trail running shoe heritage — the original trail shoe brand

Narrower last than New Balance or Hoka alternatives — not suited for wide feet
Higher price than budget trail options — reflects Salomon's engineering investment
Quicklace system replacement is proprietary — not standard shoelace compatible

FAQ

Which is better, Adidas Ultraboost 23 or Salomon XA Pro 3D V9?

Is the Adidas Ultraboost 23 worth the extra cost?

The Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Adidas Ultraboost 23 best suited to?

Boost midsole, Primeknit+ upper, Linear Energy Push, 11mm drop. Energy-return road runner.

Who is the Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 best suited to?

Contagrip, 3D Advanced Chassis, EnergyCell foam. 25-year trail running benchmark.

What are the main downsides of each?

Adidas Ultraboost 23 Running Shoes: Less maximal cushioning than Hoka Clifton — not ideal for high-mileage easy running; SPEEDROLL alternatives like Saucony Endorphin Speed 4 are faster for tempo work. Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe: Narrower last than New Balance or Hoka alternatives — not suited for wide feet; Higher price than budget trail options — reflects Salomon's engineering investment.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Adidas Ultraboost 23 Running Shoes sits at 4.5★ from 12,400 verified Amazon owners, and Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 Trail Running Shoe at 4.6★ from 8,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.