AeroPress XL Coffee Maker vs Lavazza A Modo Mio Jolie Pod Machine (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

AeroPress XL Coffee Maker

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (6,800 owners)

XL 590ml capacity, total immersion, micro-filter, 90 seconds, no electricity. 4-cup AeroPress.

Full Review

Lavazza A Modo Mio Jolie Pod Machine

8.5/10 Great

4.5★ (14,200 owners)

A Modo Mio pods, 15 bar, 30-second heat, 0.6L tank. Budget Italian pod espresso.

Full Review

At a Glance

	AeroPress XL Coffee Maker	Lavazza A Modo Mio Jolie Pod Machine
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	8.5/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,800)	4.5★ (14,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Price	Under £40	Under £50

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the AeroPress XL Coffee Maker edges ahead with a 9.0/10 vs 8.5/10. XL 590ml capacity, total immersion, micro-filter, 90 seconds, no electricity. 4-cup AeroPress. That said, the Lavazza A Modo Mio Jolie Pod Machine is worth considering if A Modo Mio pods, 15 bar, 30-second heat, 0.6L tank. Budget Italian pod espresso. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

AeroPress XL Coffee Maker

590ml capacity serves 2-4 people in one press — the original AeroPress serves 1-2
Total immersion brewing produces smooth, consistent concentrate without bitterness
Under £40 — the most affordable 4-cup quality coffee maker available
No electricity required — works on a campfire, hotel room or office with a kettle
XL's larger chamber reduces the number of press cycles needed for group brewing

Manual pressing required — 2-3 presses for 4 cups still involves effort
XL is larger than the original — less pocketable for solo travel use
Requires coarse-ground coffee and kettle — not self-contained

Lavazza A Modo Mio Jolie Pod Machine

Under £50 — the most affordable pod machine that produces genuine espresso pressure
30-second heat-up is among the fastest in the pod espresso category
A Modo Mio pod range includes Lavazza's full coffee line — Italy's most consumed coffee brand
15-bar extraction produces genuine crema on Lavazza pods
Compact footprint at 12cm wide — the smallest espresso machine reviewed

Proprietary A Modo Mio pods — ecosystem lock-in to Lavazza's range
0.6L tank requires frequent refilling for multiple drinks
No milk frothing capability — standalone espresso only

FAQ

Which is better, AeroPress XL Coffee Maker or Lavazza A Modo Mio Jolie?

Is the AeroPress XL Coffee Maker worth the extra cost?

Yes — AeroPress XL Coffee Maker scores higher at 9.0/10 vs 8.5/10.

Who is the AeroPress XL Coffee Maker best suited to?

XL 590ml capacity, total immersion, micro-filter, 90 seconds, no electricity. 4-cup AeroPress.

Who is the Lavazza A Modo Mio Jolie best suited to?

A Modo Mio pods, 15 bar, 30-second heat, 0.6L tank. Budget Italian pod espresso.

What are the main downsides of each?

AeroPress XL Coffee Maker: Manual pressing required — 2-3 presses for 4 cups still involves effort; XL is larger than the original — less pocketable for solo travel use. Lavazza A Modo Mio Jolie Pod Machine: Proprietary A Modo Mio pods — ecosystem lock-in to Lavazza's range; 0.6L tank requires frequent refilling for multiple drinks.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — AeroPress XL Coffee Maker sits at 4.5★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and Lavazza A Modo Mio Jolie Pod Machine at 4.5★ from 14,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.