Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless vs Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (9,200 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Full Review

Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.3★ (5,400 owners)

185AW suction, 60 min, self-empty station option, 2.6kg, LED screen. Chinese engineering at UK pricing.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless	Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.7/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (9,200)	4.3★ (5,400)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	80 minutes (2 batteries)	60 minutes
Price	Under £200	Under £200

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless. Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless: 185AW suction, 60 min, self-empty station option, 2.6kg, LED screen. Chinese engineering at UK pricing. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

Anti Hair Wrap removes pet and human hair from brush roll automatically — Shark's signature feature
80-minute runtime from two detachable batteries — longest of any Shark cordless
Flexology wand bends 90° to clean under furniture without stooping
DuoClean head with two brush rolls handles both hard floors and carpet in one pass
Under £200 — Shark's anti-tangle technology at the most accessible Shark price

Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off
Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime
No HEPA filtration — dust release on bin emptying is less clean than HEPA alternatives

Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless

185AW suction competes with Dyson V8's 115AW — significantly higher specification at lower price
60-minute runtime handles large homes in one session
Optional Xiaomi self-empty station available for station-based automation
LED status screen shows remaining battery, filter and suction mode
Under £200 for 185AW — the most suction per pound of any reviewed cordless vacuum

Xiaomi brand data privacy consideration — Mi Home app collects usage data
2.6kg heavier than lightweight alternatives — extended overhead cleaning tiring
Less warranty confidence than Dyson or Shark in UK consumer perception

FAQ

Which is better, Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT or Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11?

Is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT worth the extra cost?

The Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Who is the Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 best suited to?

185AW suction, 60 min, self-empty station option, 2.6kg, LED screen. Chinese engineering at UK pricing.

What are the main downsides of each?

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off; Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime. Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless: Xiaomi brand data privacy consideration — Mi Home app collects usage data; 2.6kg heavier than lightweight alternatives — extended overhead cleaning tiring.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless sits at 4.4★ from 9,200 verified Amazon owners, and Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless at 4.3★ from 5,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.