Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless vs Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (9,200 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Full Review

Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum

8.5/10 Great

4.3★ (4,200 owners)

ONEPWR interchangeable battery, 60 min, direct drive, anti-tangle. Ecosystem-compatible cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless	Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.7/10	8.5/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (9,200)	4.3★ (4,200)
Verdict	Great	Great
Anti-tangle	Anti Hair Wrap	Brush roll
Runtime	80 minutes (2 batteries)	60 minutes (dual)
Head	DuoClean	Direct drive motorised

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.5/10. Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless. That said, the Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum is worth considering if ONEPWR interchangeable battery, 60 min, direct drive, anti-tangle. Ecosystem-compatible cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

Anti Hair Wrap removes pet and human hair from brush roll automatically — Shark's signature feature
80-minute runtime from two detachable batteries — longest of any Shark cordless
Flexology wand bends 90° to clean under furniture without stooping
DuoClean head with two brush rolls handles both hard floors and carpet in one pass
Under £200 — Shark's anti-tangle technology at the most accessible Shark price

Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off
Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime
No HEPA filtration — dust release on bin emptying is less clean than HEPA alternatives

Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum

ONEPWR interchangeable battery works across Vax's full cordless tool range — drills, garden tools, wet-dry vacuums
60-minute runtime from dual batteries — above average for the price tier
Direct drive motorised head provides stronger carpet agitation than suction-only heads
Anti-tangle brush reduces hair wrap frequency
Vax UK brand with UK customer service and accessible spare parts

Less suction than Dyson V8 at comparable pricing
Anti-tangle less effective than Shark's dedicated Anti-Hair Wrap system
ONEPWR ecosystem value only if using multiple Vax cordless tools

FAQ

Which is better, Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT or Vax ONEPWR Blade 5?

Is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT worth the extra cost?

Yes — Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless scores higher at 8.7/10 vs 8.5/10.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Who is the Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 best suited to?

ONEPWR interchangeable battery, 60 min, direct drive, anti-tangle. Ecosystem-compatible cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off; Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime. Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum: Less suction than Dyson V8 at comparable pricing; Anti-tangle less effective than Shark's dedicated Anti-Hair Wrap system.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless sits at 4.4★ from 9,200 verified Amazon owners, and Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum at 4.3★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.