Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK vs Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.3★ (5,400 owners)

185AW suction, 60 min, self-empty station option, 2.6kg, LED screen. Chinese engineering at UK pricing.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK	Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (22,100)	4.3★ (5,400)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	45 minutes	60 minutes
Weight	3.1kg	2.6kg

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless: 185AW suction, 60 min, self-empty station option, 2.6kg, LED screen. Chinese engineering at UK pricing. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless

185AW suction competes with Dyson V8's 115AW — significantly higher specification at lower price
60-minute runtime handles large homes in one session
Optional Xiaomi self-empty station available for station-based automation
LED status screen shows remaining battery, filter and suction mode
Under £200 for 185AW — the most suction per pound of any reviewed cordless vacuum

Xiaomi brand data privacy consideration — Mi Home app collects usage data
2.6kg heavier than lightweight alternatives — extended overhead cleaning tiring
Less warranty confidence than Dyson or Shark in UK consumer perception

FAQ

Which is better, Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK or Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11?

Is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK worth the extra cost?

The Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Who is the Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 best suited to?

185AW suction, 60 min, self-empty station option, 2.6kg, LED screen. Chinese engineering at UK pricing.

What are the main downsides of each?

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L. Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless: Xiaomi brand data privacy consideration — Mi Home app collects usage data; 2.6kg heavier than lightweight alternatives — extended overhead cleaning tiring.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK sits at 4.4★ from 22,100 verified Amazon owners, and Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless at 4.3★ from 5,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.