Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK vs Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum

8.5/10 Great

4.3★ (4,200 owners)

ONEPWR interchangeable battery, 60 min, direct drive, anti-tangle. Ecosystem-compatible cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK	Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	8.5/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (22,100)	4.3★ (4,200)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	45 minutes	60 minutes (dual)

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum: ONEPWR interchangeable battery, 60 min, direct drive, anti-tangle. Ecosystem-compatible cordless. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum

ONEPWR interchangeable battery works across Vax's full cordless tool range — drills, garden tools, wet-dry vacuums
60-minute runtime from dual batteries — above average for the price tier
Direct drive motorised head provides stronger carpet agitation than suction-only heads
Anti-tangle brush reduces hair wrap frequency
Vax UK brand with UK customer service and accessible spare parts

Less suction than Dyson V8 at comparable pricing
Anti-tangle less effective than Shark's dedicated Anti-Hair Wrap system
ONEPWR ecosystem value only if using multiple Vax cordless tools

FAQ

Which is better, Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK or Vax ONEPWR Blade 5?

Is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK worth the extra cost?

Yes — Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK scores higher at 8.6/10 vs 8.5/10.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Who is the Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 best suited to?

ONEPWR interchangeable battery, 60 min, direct drive, anti-tangle. Ecosystem-compatible cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L. Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum: Less suction than Dyson V8 at comparable pricing; Anti-tangle less effective than Shark's dedicated Anti-Hair Wrap system.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK sits at 4.4★ from 22,100 verified Amazon owners, and Vax ONEPWR Blade 5 Cordless Vacuum at 4.3★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.