Samsung Jet 90 Complete Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Samsung Jet 90 Complete Cordless Vacuum

8.9/10 Great

4.4★ (5,600 owners)

200W, Jet Clean Station auto-empty, 60 min, multi-layer filtration. Samsung pre-Bespoke model.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Samsung Jet 90 Complete Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (5,600)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	60 minutes	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Samsung Jet 90 Complete Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10. 200W, Jet Clean Station auto-empty, 60 min, multi-layer filtration. Samsung pre-Bespoke model. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Samsung Jet 90 Complete Cordless Vacuum

Jet Clean Station automatically empties the vacuum bin without touching dust
200W digital motor competitive with premium alternatives
60-minute runtime covers most family homes in a single charge
Multi-layer filtration captures 99.999% of 0.3-micron particles
Samsung SmartThings integration allows vacuum scheduling from the app

Older model than Bespoke Jet — superseded in Samsung's range
Bespoke Jet Complete Extra offers superior features at higher pricing
Less suction than newer Dreame and Tineco alternatives at similar pricing

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Samsung Jet 90 Complete or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Samsung Jet 90 Complete worth the extra cost?

Yes — Samsung Jet 90 Complete Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Samsung Jet 90 Complete best suited to?

200W, Jet Clean Station auto-empty, 60 min, multi-layer filtration. Samsung pre-Bespoke model.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Samsung Jet 90 Complete Cordless Vacuum: Older model than Bespoke Jet — superseded in Samsung's range; Bespoke Jet Complete Extra offers superior features at higher pricing. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Samsung Jet 90 Complete Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 5,600 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.