Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (6,400 owners)

33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.7/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (6,400)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	60 min removable	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum: 33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum

33Kpa suction is exceptionally high for the price bracket
Touch LED display shows battery, mode and maintenance alerts
Anti-tangle V-shaped brush design reduces hair wrapping
60-minute runtime from a removable battery
HEPA filtration captures fine allergens

Proscenic brand newer with less established UK service
Build quality less premium than Dyson or Shark
Touch display occasionally over-sensitive

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Proscenic P12 or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Proscenic P12 worth the extra cost?

Yes — Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 8.7/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Proscenic P12 best suited to?

33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum: Proscenic brand newer with less established UK service; Build quality less premium than Dyson or Shark. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 6,400 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.