Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

8.7/10 Great

4.3★ (5,600 owners)

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.7/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (5,600)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	65 minutes	45 minutes
Warranty	2 years	5 years (Shark)

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum: Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

360° suction nozzle reaches all corners and edges without attachment changes
Wet mop pad attaches to base for simultaneous vacuuming and mopping
65-minute runtime is above average for a combined wet-dry cordless
PowerCyclone 8 technology maintains suction as the bin fills
Philips' appliance engineering heritage applied to wet-dry cordless format

Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use
Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro
Philips cordless range less marketed in UK than Dyson or Shark

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua worth the extra cost?

Yes — Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 8.7/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua best suited to?

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum: Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use; Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.3★ from 5,600 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.