Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum vs Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (6,800 owners)

HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless.

Full Review

Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.3★ (5,400 owners)

185AW suction, 60 min, self-empty station option, 2.6kg, LED screen. Chinese engineering at UK pricing.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum	Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,800)	4.3★ (5,400)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	60 min	60 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.9/10 vs 8.7/10. HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless. That said, the Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless is worth considering if 185AW suction, 60 min, self-empty station option, 2.6kg, LED screen. Chinese engineering at UK pricing. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum

HepaFlo bagged system — empty hygienically without any dust cloud, ideal for allergy sufferers
Removable battery pods swap for continuous cleaning beyond 60 minutes
The iconic Henry smiling face design beloved across British homes
Anti-tangle brush and HEPA-grade filtration
Numatic's commercial-grade build heritage in a cordless home format

Bags are an ongoing consumable cost vs bagless alternatives
Less suction than Dyson V15 flagship
Bagged capacity smaller than corded Henry

Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless

185AW suction competes with Dyson V8's 115AW — significantly higher specification at lower price
60-minute runtime handles large homes in one session
Optional Xiaomi self-empty station available for station-based automation
LED status screen shows remaining battery, filter and suction mode
Under £200 for 185AW — the most suction per pound of any reviewed cordless vacuum

Xiaomi brand data privacy consideration — Mi Home app collects usage data
2.6kg heavier than lightweight alternatives — extended overhead cleaning tiring
Less warranty confidence than Dyson or Shark in UK consumer perception

FAQ

Which is better, Numatic Henry Quick or Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11?

Is the Numatic Henry Quick worth the extra cost?

Yes — Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 8.9/10 vs 8.7/10.

Who is the Numatic Henry Quick best suited to?

HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless.

Who is the Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 best suited to?

185AW suction, 60 min, self-empty station option, 2.6kg, LED screen. Chinese engineering at UK pricing.

What are the main downsides of each?

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum: Bags are an ongoing consumable cost vs bagless alternatives; Less suction than Dyson V15 flagship. Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless: Xiaomi brand data privacy consideration — Mi Home app collects usage data; 2.6kg heavier than lightweight alternatives — extended overhead cleaning tiring.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and Xiaomi Vacuum Cleaner G11 Cordless at 4.3★ from 5,400.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.