Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (6,800 owners)

HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,800)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	60 min	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10. HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum

HepaFlo bagged system — empty hygienically without any dust cloud, ideal for allergy sufferers
Removable battery pods swap for continuous cleaning beyond 60 minutes
The iconic Henry smiling face design beloved across British homes
Anti-tangle brush and HEPA-grade filtration
Numatic's commercial-grade build heritage in a cordless home format

Bags are an ongoing consumable cost vs bagless alternatives
Less suction than Dyson V15 flagship
Bagged capacity smaller than corded Henry

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Numatic Henry Quick or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Numatic Henry Quick worth the extra cost?

Yes — Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Numatic Henry Quick best suited to?

HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum: Bags are an ongoing consumable cost vs bagless alternatives; Less suction than Dyson V15 flagship. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.