Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum vs Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (6,800 owners)

HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless.

Full Review

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

8.6/10 Great

4.3★ (4,200 owners)

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum	Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (6,800)	4.3★ (4,200)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	60 min	60 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10. HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless. That said, the Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner is worth considering if 26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum

HepaFlo bagged system — empty hygienically without any dust cloud, ideal for allergy sufferers
Removable battery pods swap for continuous cleaning beyond 60 minutes
The iconic Henry smiling face design beloved across British homes
Anti-tangle brush and HEPA-grade filtration
Numatic's commercial-grade build heritage in a cordless home format

Bags are an ongoing consumable cost vs bagless alternatives
Less suction than Dyson V15 flagship
Bagged capacity smaller than corded Henry

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

26,000 Pa suction at 1.5kg — highest suction-to-weight ratio of any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes in a single charge
Optional self-empty base station available separately for automation upgrade
Under £150 — the most affordable 26,000 Pa cordless on the market
Midea's appliance engineering heritage from one of the world's largest appliance manufacturers

Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark
Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase
No laser detection — Dyson V12/V15 unique there

FAQ

Which is better, Numatic Henry Quick or Midea P7?

Is the Numatic Henry Quick worth the extra cost?

Yes — Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Numatic Henry Quick best suited to?

HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless.

Who is the Midea P7 best suited to?

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum: Bags are an ongoing consumable cost vs bagless alternatives; Less suction than Dyson V15 flagship. Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark; Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner at 4.3★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.