Nilfisk Easy 36V Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Nilfisk Easy 36V Cordless Vacuum

8.4/10 Very Good

4.2★ (2,800 owners)

36V, 45 min, commercial build quality, bagless, tool-free brush change. Danish professional vacuum.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Nilfisk Easy 36V Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.2★ (2,800)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	45 minutes	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK edges ahead with a 8.6/10 vs 8.4/10. Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. That said, the Nilfisk Easy 36V Cordless Vacuum is worth considering if 36V, 45 min, commercial build quality, bagless, tool-free brush change. Danish professional vacuum. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Nilfisk Easy 36V Cordless Vacuum

Danish commercial cleaning equipment engineering applied to home cordless format
36V motor provides strong suction in a mid-range price bracket
Tool-free brush roll change — remove and reinsert without any tools for maintenance
Commercial-grade build quality — Nilfisk makes floor cleaning equipment for hospitals
Bagless hygiene emptying with transparent bin for fill level visibility

Nilfisk brand less known in UK consumer market despite commercial strength
45-minute runtime is average for the price
Less suction than Dyson or Shark alternatives at equivalent pricing

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Nilfisk Easy 36V or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Nilfisk Easy 36V worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Nilfisk Easy 36V best suited to?

36V, 45 min, commercial build quality, bagless, tool-free brush change. Danish professional vacuum.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Nilfisk Easy 36V Cordless Vacuum: Nilfisk brand less known in UK consumer market despite commercial strength; 45-minute runtime is average for the price. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Nilfisk Easy 36V Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.2★ from 2,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.