Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (4,200 owners)

3-in-1 design, removable battery, HEPA, 60min, German engineering. The modular German cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (4,200)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Runtime	60 min	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 9.0/10 vs 8.6/10. 3-in-1 design, removable battery, HEPA, 60min, German engineering. The modular German cordless. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum

Unique 3-in-1 design repositions the battery and bin for floor, handheld or reach cleaning
Removable battery swaps for continuous cleaning beyond 60 minutes
HEPA filtration with sealed system captures fine allergens
Stands freely without a wall bracket in the floor configuration
Miele's German engineering with a reputation for decades of durability

Premium Miele pricing
Heavier than the lightest cordless options
3-in-1 reconfiguration adds handling steps

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Miele Triflex HX2 or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Miele Triflex HX2 worth the extra cost?

Yes — Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 9.0/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Miele Triflex HX2 best suited to?

3-in-1 design, removable battery, HEPA, 60min, German engineering. The modular German cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum: Premium Miele pricing; Heavier than the lightest cordless options. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.