Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum

9.1/10 Excellent

4.5★ (4,800 owners)

22.2V, 60min, HygieneFilter, 3-in-1, XXL bin, Miele quality. German premium cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	9.1/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (4,800)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Runtime	60 minutes	45 minutes
Warranty	5 years	5 years (Shark)

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.6/10. 22.2V, 60min, HygieneFilter, 3-in-1, XXL bin, Miele quality. German premium cordless. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum

XXL dustbin capacity reduces emptying frequency during large sessions
HygieneFilter traps allergens and fine dust with Miele's commercial-grade filtration
3-in-1 configuration converts to handheld and mini vacuum without adapters
60-minute runtime handles large homes without interruption
Miele's German appliance engineering and 5-year warranty commitment

Premium pricing above Dyson V12 for comparable specification
3.3kg heavier than Dyson V12 Detect Slim for extended overhead work
Miele's cordless range less refined UI than Dyson's app-connected alternatives

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Miele Triflex HX1 Pro or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Miele Triflex HX1 Pro worth the extra cost?

Yes — Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 9.1/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Miele Triflex HX1 Pro best suited to?

22.2V, 60min, HygieneFilter, 3-in-1, XXL bin, Miele quality. German premium cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum: Premium pricing above Dyson V12 for comparable specification; 3.3kg heavier than Dyson V12 Detect Slim for extended overhead work. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.