Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

8.6/10 Great

4.3★ (4,200 owners)

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (9,200 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner	Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (4,200)	4.4★ (9,200)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	60 minutes	80 minutes (2 batteries)
Price	Under £150	Under £200

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: 26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless. Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

26,000 Pa suction at 1.5kg — highest suction-to-weight ratio of any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes in a single charge
Optional self-empty base station available separately for automation upgrade
Under £150 — the most affordable 26,000 Pa cordless on the market
Midea's appliance engineering heritage from one of the world's largest appliance manufacturers

Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark
Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase
No laser detection — Dyson V12/V15 unique there

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

Anti Hair Wrap removes pet and human hair from brush roll automatically — Shark's signature feature
80-minute runtime from two detachable batteries — longest of any Shark cordless
Flexology wand bends 90° to clean under furniture without stooping
DuoClean head with two brush rolls handles both hard floors and carpet in one pass
Under £200 — Shark's anti-tangle technology at the most accessible Shark price

Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off
Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime
No HEPA filtration — dust release on bin emptying is less clean than HEPA alternatives

FAQ

Which is better, Midea P7 or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT?

Is the Midea P7 worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Midea P7 best suited to?

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark; Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase. Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off; Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner sits at 4.3★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless at 4.4★ from 9,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.