Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

8.6/10 Great

4.3★ (4,200 owners)

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Full Review

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

8.7/10 Great

4.3★ (5,600 owners)

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner	Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (4,200)	4.3★ (5,600)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	60 minutes	65 minutes

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: 26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless. Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum: Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

26,000 Pa suction at 1.5kg — highest suction-to-weight ratio of any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes in a single charge
Optional self-empty base station available separately for automation upgrade
Under £150 — the most affordable 26,000 Pa cordless on the market
Midea's appliance engineering heritage from one of the world's largest appliance manufacturers

Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark
Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase
No laser detection — Dyson V12/V15 unique there

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

360° suction nozzle reaches all corners and edges without attachment changes
Wet mop pad attaches to base for simultaneous vacuuming and mopping
65-minute runtime is above average for a combined wet-dry cordless
PowerCyclone 8 technology maintains suction as the bin fills
Philips' appliance engineering heritage applied to wet-dry cordless format

Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use
Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro
Philips cordless range less marketed in UK than Dyson or Shark

FAQ

Which is better, Midea P7 or Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua?

Is the Midea P7 worth the extra cost?

The Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Midea P7 best suited to?

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Who is the Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua best suited to?

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

What are the main downsides of each?

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark; Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase. Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum: Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use; Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner sits at 4.3★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum at 4.3★ from 5,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.