Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

8.6/10 Great

4.3★ (4,200 owners)

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Full Review

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

8.4/10 Very Good

4.3★ (3,600 owners)

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner	Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	8.4/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (4,200)	4.3★ (3,600)
Verdict	Great	Very Good
Runtime	60 minutes	40 min stick + 45 min handheld
Origin	Midea appliances	UK (Numatic)

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner edges ahead with a 8.6/10 vs 8.4/10. 26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless. That said, the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless is worth considering if Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

26,000 Pa suction at 1.5kg — highest suction-to-weight ratio of any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes in a single charge
Optional self-empty base station available separately for automation upgrade
Under £150 — the most affordable 26,000 Pa cordless on the market
Midea's appliance engineering heritage from one of the world's largest appliance manufacturers

Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark
Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase
No laser detection — Dyson V12/V15 unique there

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

Detaches into a handheld vacuum for cars, stairs and upholstery independently
HEPA H12 filtration — Henry's commercial-grade filtration in a cordless format
Numatic's commercial build quality — their corded vacuums last 15+ years in offices
40-minute stick + 45-minute handheld runtime from two separate charges
UK-manufactured Numatic quality control behind the cheerful red face

Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units
Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing
Handheld mode range is shorter than stick mode for continuous use

FAQ

Which is better, Midea P7 or Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1?

Is the Midea P7 worth the extra cost?

Yes — Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner scores higher at 8.6/10 vs 8.4/10.

Who is the Midea P7 best suited to?

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Who is the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 best suited to?

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark; Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase. Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless: Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units; Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner sits at 4.3★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless at 4.3★ from 3,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.