Lupe Pure Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Lupe Pure Cordless Vacuum

9.0/10 Excellent

4.6★ (2,400 owners)

60 min, 5-year warranty UK-made, no performance drop, tangle-free brush. British startup challenger.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Lupe Pure Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.6★ (2,400)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Warranty	5 years (longest cordless)	5 years (Shark)

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Lupe Pure Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 9.0/10 vs 8.6/10. 60 min, 5-year warranty UK-made, no performance drop, tangle-free brush. British startup challenger. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Lupe Pure Cordless Vacuum

British designed and made — Lupe Technology founded in Cambridge, challenging Dyson on home turf
5-year warranty — the longest of any UK cordless vacuum warranty
Constant suction performance — no drop in power as the battery depletes, unlike most alternatives
Tangle-resistant brush roll reduces hair maintenance frequency
Quiet 65dB operation — noticeably quieter than Dyson V12 or Shark alternatives

Newer brand with fewer Amazon reviews than established alternatives
Less suction than Dyson V15 at comparable pricing
Cambridge startup — limited physical retail presence for in-person assessment

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Lupe Pure or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Lupe Pure worth the extra cost?

Yes — Lupe Pure Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 9.0/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Lupe Pure best suited to?

60 min, 5-year warranty UK-made, no performance drop, tangle-free brush. British startup challenger.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Lupe Pure Cordless Vacuum: Newer brand with fewer Amazon reviews than established alternatives; Less suction than Dyson V15 at comparable pricing. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Lupe Pure Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.6★ from 2,400 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.