LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero Cordless Vacuum

9.0/10 Excellent

4.4★ (3,200 owners)

200W Kompressor, dual battery, charging stand, 120 min total, HEPA. LG's flagship cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	9.0/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (3,200)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Runtime	120 min (dual battery)	45 minutes
Weight	3.3kg	3.1kg

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 9.0/10 vs 8.6/10. 200W Kompressor, dual battery, charging stand, 120 min total, HEPA. LG's flagship cordless. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero Cordless Vacuum

Kompressor technology compresses debris in the bin — doubles effective capacity without emptying
Dual battery system provides 120 minutes total runtime — highest of any cordless vacuum
Charging stand stores both batteries and the vacuum in one floor unit
200W digital motor competitive with Dyson V12 at similar pricing
HEPA filtration with washing capability — replaceable filters aren't required

Kompressor mechanism adds weight at 3.3kg — heavier than Dyson alternatives
Dual battery charging takes longer than single battery alternatives
Premium Korean brand engineering less widely serviced than Dyson in UK

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero worth the extra cost?

Yes — LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 9.0/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero best suited to?

200W Kompressor, dual battery, charging stand, 120 min total, HEPA. LG's flagship cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero Cordless Vacuum: Kompressor mechanism adds weight at 3.3kg — heavier than Dyson alternatives; Dual battery charging takes longer than single battery alternatives. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — LG A9K-ULTRA2 CordZero Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 3,200 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.