Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

8.5/10 Great

4.3★ (4,800 owners)

ULTRA Vortex motor, 40 min, drop-and-go charging, compact. Hoover's premium cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.5/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (4,800)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	40 minutes	45 minutes
Weight	2.1kg	3.1kg
Warranty	2 years	5 years (Shark)

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: ULTRA Vortex motor, 40 min, drop-and-go charging, compact. Hoover's premium cordless. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

ULTRA Vortex motor maintains consistent suction throughout the charge cycle
Drop-and-go charging dock stores and charges the vacuum upright in one move
UK brand recognition — Hoover's century of vacuum heritage now in cordless form
Compact 2.1kg is lighter than most mid-range cordless vacuums
Compatible with Hoover's wide accessory range for stair and upholstery cleaning

40-minute runtime is average for the price bracket
Less suction than Dyson or Shark alternatives at similar pricing
Hoover's cordless range is newer — less proven than their corded heritage

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Hoover HF9 or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Hoover HF9 worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Hoover HF9 best suited to?

ULTRA Vortex motor, 40 min, drop-and-go charging, compact. Hoover's premium cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: 40-minute runtime is average for the price bracket; Less suction than Dyson or Shark alternatives at similar pricing. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner sits at 4.3★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.