Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

8.5/10 Great

4.3★ (4,800 owners)

ULTRA Vortex motor, 40 min, drop-and-go charging, compact. Hoover's premium cordless.

Full Review

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

8.6/10 Great

4.3★ (4,200 owners)

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner	Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner
247Verdict Score	8.5/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (4,800)	4.3★ (4,200)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	40 minutes	60 minutes
Weight	2.1kg	1.5kg

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: ULTRA Vortex motor, 40 min, drop-and-go charging, compact. Hoover's premium cordless. Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: 26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

ULTRA Vortex motor maintains consistent suction throughout the charge cycle
Drop-and-go charging dock stores and charges the vacuum upright in one move
UK brand recognition — Hoover's century of vacuum heritage now in cordless form
Compact 2.1kg is lighter than most mid-range cordless vacuums
Compatible with Hoover's wide accessory range for stair and upholstery cleaning

40-minute runtime is average for the price bracket
Less suction than Dyson or Shark alternatives at similar pricing
Hoover's cordless range is newer — less proven than their corded heritage

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

26,000 Pa suction at 1.5kg — highest suction-to-weight ratio of any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes in a single charge
Optional self-empty base station available separately for automation upgrade
Under £150 — the most affordable 26,000 Pa cordless on the market
Midea's appliance engineering heritage from one of the world's largest appliance manufacturers

Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark
Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase
No laser detection — Dyson V12/V15 unique there

FAQ

Which is better, Hoover HF9 or Midea P7?

Is the Hoover HF9 worth the extra cost?

The Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Hoover HF9 best suited to?

ULTRA Vortex motor, 40 min, drop-and-go charging, compact. Hoover's premium cordless.

Who is the Midea P7 best suited to?

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: 40-minute runtime is average for the price bracket; Less suction than Dyson or Shark alternatives at similar pricing. Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark; Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Hoover HF9 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner sits at 4.3★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner at 4.3★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.