Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

8.4/10 Very Good

4.3★ (3,600 owners)

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (9,200 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless	Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (3,600)	4.4★ (9,200)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	40 min stick + 45 min handheld	80 minutes (2 batteries)
Filter	HEPA H12	Non-HEPA

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.4/10. Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless. That said, the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless is worth considering if Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

Detaches into a handheld vacuum for cars, stairs and upholstery independently
HEPA H12 filtration — Henry's commercial-grade filtration in a cordless format
Numatic's commercial build quality — their corded vacuums last 15+ years in offices
40-minute stick + 45-minute handheld runtime from two separate charges
UK-manufactured Numatic quality control behind the cheerful red face

Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units
Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing
Handheld mode range is shorter than stick mode for continuous use

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

Anti Hair Wrap removes pet and human hair from brush roll automatically — Shark's signature feature
80-minute runtime from two detachable batteries — longest of any Shark cordless
Flexology wand bends 90° to clean under furniture without stooping
DuoClean head with two brush rolls handles both hard floors and carpet in one pass
Under £200 — Shark's anti-tangle technology at the most accessible Shark price

Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off
Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime
No HEPA filtration — dust release on bin emptying is less clean than HEPA alternatives

FAQ

Which is better, Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT?

Is the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 best suited to?

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless: Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units; Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing. Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off; Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless sits at 4.3★ from 3,600 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless at 4.4★ from 9,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.