Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

8.4/10 Very Good

4.3★ (3,600 owners)

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (3,600)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	40 min stick + 45 min handheld	45 minutes
Warranty	2 years	5 years (Shark)

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK edges ahead with a 8.6/10 vs 8.4/10. Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. That said, the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless is worth considering if Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

Detaches into a handheld vacuum for cars, stairs and upholstery independently
HEPA H12 filtration — Henry's commercial-grade filtration in a cordless format
Numatic's commercial build quality — their corded vacuums last 15+ years in offices
40-minute stick + 45-minute handheld runtime from two separate charges
UK-manufactured Numatic quality control behind the cheerful red face

Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units
Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing
Handheld mode range is shorter than stick mode for continuous use

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 best suited to?

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless: Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units; Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless sits at 4.3★ from 3,600 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.