Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless vs Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

8.4/10 Very Good

4.3★ (3,600 owners)

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

Full Review

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

8.7/10 Great

4.3★ (5,600 owners)

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless	Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (3,600)	4.3★ (5,600)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	40 min stick + 45 min handheld	65 minutes
Warranty	2 years	2 years

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.4/10. Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry. That said, the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless is worth considering if Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless

Detaches into a handheld vacuum for cars, stairs and upholstery independently
HEPA H12 filtration — Henry's commercial-grade filtration in a cordless format
Numatic's commercial build quality — their corded vacuums last 15+ years in offices
40-minute stick + 45-minute handheld runtime from two separate charges
UK-manufactured Numatic quality control behind the cheerful red face

Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units
Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing
Handheld mode range is shorter than stick mode for continuous use

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

360° suction nozzle reaches all corners and edges without attachment changes
Wet mop pad attaches to base for simultaneous vacuuming and mopping
65-minute runtime is above average for a combined wet-dry cordless
PowerCyclone 8 technology maintains suction as the bin fills
Philips' appliance engineering heritage applied to wet-dry cordless format

Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use
Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro
Philips cordless range less marketed in UK than Dyson or Shark

FAQ

Which is better, Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 or Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua?

Is the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 worth the extra cost?

The Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 best suited to?

Detachable 2-in-1, HEPA, 40 min, 45min handheld, Numatic build quality. Henry gone cordless.

Who is the Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua best suited to?

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

What are the main downsides of each?

Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless: Two-battery system means remembering to charge both units; Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing. Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum: Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use; Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Henry Quick HVB160-11 2-in-1 Cordless sits at 4.3★ from 3,600 verified Amazon owners, and Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum at 4.3★ from 5,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.