Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

8.4/10 Very Good

4.4★ (4,800 owners)

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (9,200 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (4,800)	4.4★ (9,200)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	40 minutes	80 minutes (2 batteries)
Filter	HEPA	Non-HEPA

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.4/10. Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless. That said, the Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum is worth considering if 2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

Henry brand recognition — every UK home knows the cheerful red face icon
2-in-1 handheld and stick configuration covers stairs and above-floor cleaning
HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of allergens
Strong suction for a budget cordless — better than generic alternatives
Numatic (Henry's maker) builds to commercial standards even in consumer products

0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions
40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives
Less suction than Dyson at similar pricing — the brand premium is heritage, not specification

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

Anti Hair Wrap removes pet and human hair from brush roll automatically — Shark's signature feature
80-minute runtime from two detachable batteries — longest of any Shark cordless
Flexology wand bends 90° to clean under furniture without stooping
DuoClean head with two brush rolls handles both hard floors and carpet in one pass
Under £200 — Shark's anti-tangle technology at the most accessible Shark price

Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off
Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime
No HEPA filtration — dust release on bin emptying is less clean than HEPA alternatives

FAQ

Which is better, Henry Cordless HVB160 or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT?

Is the Henry Cordless HVB160 worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Henry Cordless HVB160 best suited to?

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum: 0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions; 40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives. Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off; Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless at 4.4★ from 9,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.