Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

8.4/10 Very Good

4.4★ (4,800 owners)

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (4,800)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	40 minutes	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK edges ahead with a 8.6/10 vs 8.4/10. Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. That said, the Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum is worth considering if 2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

Henry brand recognition — every UK home knows the cheerful red face icon
2-in-1 handheld and stick configuration covers stairs and above-floor cleaning
HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of allergens
Strong suction for a budget cordless — better than generic alternatives
Numatic (Henry's maker) builds to commercial standards even in consumer products

0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions
40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives
Less suction than Dyson at similar pricing — the brand premium is heritage, not specification

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Henry Cordless HVB160 or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Henry Cordless HVB160 worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Henry Cordless HVB160 best suited to?

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum: 0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions; 40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.