Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum vs Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum (2026)
Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.
Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum
2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.
Full Review
Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum
33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless.
Full ReviewAt a Glance
| Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum | Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum | |
|---|---|---|
| 247Verdict Score | 8.4/10 | 8.7/10 |
| Owner Rating | 4.4★ (4,800) | 4.4★ (6,400) |
| Verdict | Very Good | Great |
| Runtime | 40 minutes | 60 min removable |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Quick Verdict
Both are strong choices, but the Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.4/10. 33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless. That said, the Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum is worth considering if 2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry. Check the current price on Amazon →
Pros & Cons Side by Side
Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum
- Henry brand recognition — every UK home knows the cheerful red face icon
- 2-in-1 handheld and stick configuration covers stairs and above-floor cleaning
- HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of allergens
- Strong suction for a budget cordless — better than generic alternatives
- Numatic (Henry's maker) builds to commercial standards even in consumer products
- 0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions
- 40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives
- Less suction than Dyson at similar pricing — the brand premium is heritage, not specification
Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum
- 33Kpa suction is exceptionally high for the price bracket
- Touch LED display shows battery, mode and maintenance alerts
- Anti-tangle V-shaped brush design reduces hair wrapping
- 60-minute runtime from a removable battery
- HEPA filtration captures fine allergens
- Proscenic brand newer with less established UK service
- Build quality less premium than Dyson or Shark
- Touch display occasionally over-sensitive
FAQ
Which is better, Henry Cordless HVB160 or Proscenic P12?
Both are strong choices, but the Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.4/10. 33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless. That said, the Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum is worth considering if 2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.
Is the Henry Cordless HVB160 worth the extra cost?
The Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.
Who is the Henry Cordless HVB160 best suited to?
2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.
Who is the Proscenic P12 best suited to?
33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless.
What are the main downsides of each?
Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum: 0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions; 40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives. Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum: Proscenic brand newer with less established UK service; Build quality less premium than Dyson or Shark.
Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?
Largely, yes — Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum at 4.4★ from 6,400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.
Popular in Cordless Vacuums
Also Worth Considering
Dyson V15 Detect Absolute Cordless Vacuum
Laser reveals dust, piezo sensor counts particles, 60-min runtime, HEPA. The most advanced cordless.
Read Full Review →
Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum
25% wider head, 120-min XL battery, 0.77L bin, 220AW suction. Dyson for large homes.
Read Full Review →
Dyson V11 Absolute Cordless Vacuum
The sweet spot in the Dyson range. 60-minute battery, auto floor detection, dynamic load sensor.
Read Full Review →