Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum vs Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

8.4/10 Very Good

4.4★ (4,800 owners)

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Full Review

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum

8.9/10 Great

4.5★ (6,800 owners)

HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum	Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	8.9/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (4,800)	4.5★ (6,800)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	40 minutes	60 min

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.9/10 vs 8.4/10. HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless. That said, the Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum is worth considering if 2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

Henry brand recognition — every UK home knows the cheerful red face icon
2-in-1 handheld and stick configuration covers stairs and above-floor cleaning
HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of allergens
Strong suction for a budget cordless — better than generic alternatives
Numatic (Henry's maker) builds to commercial standards even in consumer products

0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions
40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives
Less suction than Dyson at similar pricing — the brand premium is heritage, not specification

Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum

HepaFlo bagged system — empty hygienically without any dust cloud, ideal for allergy sufferers
Removable battery pods swap for continuous cleaning beyond 60 minutes
The iconic Henry smiling face design beloved across British homes
Anti-tangle brush and HEPA-grade filtration
Numatic's commercial-grade build heritage in a cordless home format

Bags are an ongoing consumable cost vs bagless alternatives
Less suction than Dyson V15 flagship
Bagged capacity smaller than corded Henry

FAQ

Which is better, Henry Cordless HVB160 or Numatic Henry Quick?

Is the Henry Cordless HVB160 worth the extra cost?

The Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Henry Cordless HVB160 best suited to?

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Who is the Numatic Henry Quick best suited to?

HepaFlo bags, 60min removable pods, anti-tangle, the iconic Henry face, British. Bagged cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum: 0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions; 40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives. Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum: Bags are an ongoing consumable cost vs bagless alternatives; Less suction than Dyson V15 flagship.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Numatic Henry Quick Cordless Vacuum at 4.5★ from 6,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.