Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum vs Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

8.4/10 Very Good

4.4★ (4,800 owners)

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Full Review

Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum

9.0/10 Excellent

4.5★ (4,200 owners)

3-in-1 design, removable battery, HEPA, 60min, German engineering. The modular German cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum	Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	9.0/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (4,800)	4.5★ (4,200)
Verdict	Very Good	Excellent
Runtime	40 minutes	60 min
Filter	HEPA	HEPA sealed

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 9.0/10 vs 8.4/10. 3-in-1 design, removable battery, HEPA, 60min, German engineering. The modular German cordless. That said, the Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum is worth considering if 2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

Henry brand recognition — every UK home knows the cheerful red face icon
2-in-1 handheld and stick configuration covers stairs and above-floor cleaning
HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of allergens
Strong suction for a budget cordless — better than generic alternatives
Numatic (Henry's maker) builds to commercial standards even in consumer products

0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions
40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives
Less suction than Dyson at similar pricing — the brand premium is heritage, not specification

Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum

Unique 3-in-1 design repositions the battery and bin for floor, handheld or reach cleaning
Removable battery swaps for continuous cleaning beyond 60 minutes
HEPA filtration with sealed system captures fine allergens
Stands freely without a wall bracket in the floor configuration
Miele's German engineering with a reputation for decades of durability

Premium Miele pricing
Heavier than the lightest cordless options
3-in-1 reconfiguration adds handling steps

FAQ

Which is better, Henry Cordless HVB160 or Miele Triflex HX2?

Is the Henry Cordless HVB160 worth the extra cost?

The Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Henry Cordless HVB160 best suited to?

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Who is the Miele Triflex HX2 best suited to?

3-in-1 design, removable battery, HEPA, 60min, German engineering. The modular German cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum: 0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions; 40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives. Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum: Premium Miele pricing; Heavier than the lightest cordless options.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Miele Triflex HX2 Cordless Vacuum at 4.5★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.