Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum vs Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

8.4/10 Very Good

4.4★ (4,800 owners)

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Full Review

Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum

9.1/10 Excellent

4.5★ (4,800 owners)

22.2V, 60min, HygieneFilter, 3-in-1, XXL bin, Miele quality. German premium cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum	Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	9.1/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (4,800)	4.5★ (4,800)
Verdict	Very Good	Excellent
Config	2-in-1 handheld/stick	3-in-1
Runtime	40 minutes	60 minutes
Filter	HEPA	HygieneFilter (commercial-grade)

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 9.1/10 vs 8.4/10. 22.2V, 60min, HygieneFilter, 3-in-1, XXL bin, Miele quality. German premium cordless. That said, the Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum is worth considering if 2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

Henry brand recognition — every UK home knows the cheerful red face icon
2-in-1 handheld and stick configuration covers stairs and above-floor cleaning
HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of allergens
Strong suction for a budget cordless — better than generic alternatives
Numatic (Henry's maker) builds to commercial standards even in consumer products

0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions
40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives
Less suction than Dyson at similar pricing — the brand premium is heritage, not specification

Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum

XXL dustbin capacity reduces emptying frequency during large sessions
HygieneFilter traps allergens and fine dust with Miele's commercial-grade filtration
3-in-1 configuration converts to handheld and mini vacuum without adapters
60-minute runtime handles large homes without interruption
Miele's German appliance engineering and 5-year warranty commitment

Premium pricing above Dyson V12 for comparable specification
3.3kg heavier than Dyson V12 Detect Slim for extended overhead work
Miele's cordless range less refined UI than Dyson's app-connected alternatives

FAQ

Which is better, Henry Cordless HVB160 or Miele Triflex HX1 Pro?

Is the Henry Cordless HVB160 worth the extra cost?

The Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Henry Cordless HVB160 best suited to?

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Who is the Miele Triflex HX1 Pro best suited to?

22.2V, 60min, HygieneFilter, 3-in-1, XXL bin, Miele quality. German premium cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum: 0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions; 40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives. Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum: Premium pricing above Dyson V12 for comparable specification; 3.3kg heavier than Dyson V12 Detect Slim for extended overhead work.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Miele Triflex HX1 Pro Cordless Vacuum at 4.5★ from 4,800.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.