Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum vs Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

8.4/10 Very Good

4.4★ (4,800 owners)

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Full Review

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

8.6/10 Great

4.3★ (4,200 owners)

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum	Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner
247Verdict Score	8.4/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (4,800)	4.3★ (4,200)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	40 minutes	60 minutes
Origin	UK brand icon	Midea appliances

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner edges ahead with a 8.6/10 vs 8.4/10. 26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless. That said, the Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum is worth considering if 2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum

Henry brand recognition — every UK home knows the cheerful red face icon
2-in-1 handheld and stick configuration covers stairs and above-floor cleaning
HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of allergens
Strong suction for a budget cordless — better than generic alternatives
Numatic (Henry's maker) builds to commercial standards even in consumer products

0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions
40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives
Less suction than Dyson at similar pricing — the brand premium is heritage, not specification

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

26,000 Pa suction at 1.5kg — highest suction-to-weight ratio of any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes in a single charge
Optional self-empty base station available separately for automation upgrade
Under £150 — the most affordable 26,000 Pa cordless on the market
Midea's appliance engineering heritage from one of the world's largest appliance manufacturers

Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark
Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase
No laser detection — Dyson V12/V15 unique there

FAQ

Which is better, Henry Cordless HVB160 or Midea P7?

Is the Henry Cordless HVB160 worth the extra cost?

The Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Henry Cordless HVB160 best suited to?

2-in-1 handheld/stick, 40 min, 0.7L capacity, HEPA, UK icon. The cordless Henry.

Who is the Midea P7 best suited to?

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum: 0.7L dust capacity requires frequent emptying on large clean sessions; 40-minute runtime is adequate but trails premium alternatives. Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark; Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Henry Cordless HVB160 Vacuum sits at 4.4★ from 4,800 verified Amazon owners, and Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner at 4.3★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.