Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum

8.6/10 Great

4.3★ (6,800 owners)

Self-emptying AirLoc chamber, 40 min, carpet rake, 2.6kg. UK invention, patented self-empty.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (6,800)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Weight	2.6kg	3.1kg
Runtime	40 minutes	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum: Self-emptying AirLoc chamber, 40 min, carpet rake, 2.6kg. UK invention, patented self-empty. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum

AirLoc patented chamber compresses and stores collected debris — empties hygienically in one block
Invented and designed in the UK by Worcester-based Gtech — unique British engineering story
Carpet rake lifts and separates fibres before suction for deeper extraction
2.6kg lightweight makes extended sessions less tiring
6,800 Amazon reviews at 4.3★ from UK households who prefer British alternatives

AirLoc emptying mechanism requires practice to master without dust release
Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing
40-minute runtime trails premium alternatives

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Gtech AirRam Mk2 or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Gtech AirRam Mk2 worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Gtech AirRam Mk2 best suited to?

Self-emptying AirLoc chamber, 40 min, carpet rake, 2.6kg. UK invention, patented self-empty.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum: AirLoc emptying mechanism requires practice to master without dust release; Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.3★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.