Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum vs Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum

8.6/10 Great

4.3★ (6,800 owners)

Self-emptying AirLoc chamber, 40 min, carpet rake, 2.6kg. UK invention, patented self-empty.

Full Review

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

8.6/10 Great

4.3★ (4,200 owners)

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum	Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner
247Verdict Score	8.6/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.3★ (6,800)	4.3★ (4,200)
Verdict	Great	Great
Weight	2.6kg	1.5kg
Runtime	40 minutes	60 minutes

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum: Self-emptying AirLoc chamber, 40 min, carpet rake, 2.6kg. UK invention, patented self-empty. Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: 26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum

AirLoc patented chamber compresses and stores collected debris — empties hygienically in one block
Invented and designed in the UK by Worcester-based Gtech — unique British engineering story
Carpet rake lifts and separates fibres before suction for deeper extraction
2.6kg lightweight makes extended sessions less tiring
6,800 Amazon reviews at 4.3★ from UK households who prefer British alternatives

AirLoc emptying mechanism requires practice to master without dust release
Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing
40-minute runtime trails premium alternatives

Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

26,000 Pa suction at 1.5kg — highest suction-to-weight ratio of any reviewed cordless vacuum
60-minute runtime handles large homes in a single charge
Optional self-empty base station available separately for automation upgrade
Under £150 — the most affordable 26,000 Pa cordless on the market
Midea's appliance engineering heritage from one of the world's largest appliance manufacturers

Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark
Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase
No laser detection — Dyson V12/V15 unique there

FAQ

Which is better, Gtech AirRam Mk2 or Midea P7?

Is the Gtech AirRam Mk2 worth the extra cost?

The Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Gtech AirRam Mk2 best suited to?

Self-emptying AirLoc chamber, 40 min, carpet rake, 2.6kg. UK invention, patented self-empty.

Who is the Midea P7 best suited to?

26000 Pa, 60 min, self-empty base option, lightweight 1.5kg. Lightest high-suction cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum: AirLoc emptying mechanism requires practice to master without dust release; Less suction than Dyson alternatives at comparable pricing. Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner: Midea brand less established in UK market for warranty confidence vs Dyson or Shark; Self-empty station sold separately — the headline feature requires additional purchase.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gtech AirRam Mk2 Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.3★ from 6,800 verified Amazon owners, and Midea P7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner at 4.3★ from 4,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.