Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum

8.2/10 Very Good

4.1★ (2,800 owners)

22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (9,200 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.2/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.1★ (2,800)	4.4★ (9,200)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	30 minutes	80 minutes (2 batteries)
Price	Under £80	Under £200

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.2/10. Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless. That said, the Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum is worth considering if 22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum

Under £80 — one of the most affordable European-brand cordless vacuums
Detachable 2-in-1 for stairs and above-floor cleaning without separate tools
Gorenje's Slovenian appliance engineering — European manufacturing rather than Chinese alternatives
Lightweight at 1.8kg — easy to carry between rooms
HEPA filter captures allergens adequately for general household use

30-minute runtime is below average — only adequate for smaller flats
0.4L bin requires very frequent emptying
Gorenje brand unknown in UK market — no established service network

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

Anti Hair Wrap removes pet and human hair from brush roll automatically — Shark's signature feature
80-minute runtime from two detachable batteries — longest of any Shark cordless
Flexology wand bends 90° to clean under furniture without stooping
DuoClean head with two brush rolls handles both hard floors and carpet in one pass
Under £200 — Shark's anti-tangle technology at the most accessible Shark price

Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off
Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime
No HEPA filtration — dust release on bin emptying is less clean than HEPA alternatives

FAQ

Which is better, Gorenje SVC252FBK or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT?

Is the Gorenje SVC252FBK worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Gorenje SVC252FBK best suited to?

22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum: 30-minute runtime is below average — only adequate for smaller flats; 0.4L bin requires very frequent emptying. Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off; Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.1★ from 2,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless at 4.4★ from 9,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.