Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum

8.2/10 Very Good

4.1★ (2,800 owners)

22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.2/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.1★ (2,800)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	30 minutes	45 minutes
Weight	1.8kg	3.1kg

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK edges ahead with a 8.6/10 vs 8.2/10. Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. That said, the Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum is worth considering if 22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum

Under £80 — one of the most affordable European-brand cordless vacuums
Detachable 2-in-1 for stairs and above-floor cleaning without separate tools
Gorenje's Slovenian appliance engineering — European manufacturing rather than Chinese alternatives
Lightweight at 1.8kg — easy to carry between rooms
HEPA filter captures allergens adequately for general household use

30-minute runtime is below average — only adequate for smaller flats
0.4L bin requires very frequent emptying
Gorenje brand unknown in UK market — no established service network

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Gorenje SVC252FBK or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Gorenje SVC252FBK worth the extra cost?

The Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Gorenje SVC252FBK best suited to?

22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum: 30-minute runtime is below average — only adequate for smaller flats; 0.4L bin requires very frequent emptying. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.1★ from 2,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.