Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum vs Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum (2026)
Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.
Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum
22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless.
Full Review
Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum
33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless.
Full ReviewAt a Glance
| Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum | Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum | |
|---|---|---|
| 247Verdict Score | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 |
| Owner Rating | 4.1★ (2,800) | 4.4★ (6,400) |
| Verdict | Very Good | Great |
| Runtime | 30 minutes | 60 min removable |
Quick Verdict
Both are strong choices, but the Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.2/10. 33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless. That said, the Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum is worth considering if 22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →
Pros & Cons Side by Side
Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum
- Under £80 — one of the most affordable European-brand cordless vacuums
- Detachable 2-in-1 for stairs and above-floor cleaning without separate tools
- Gorenje's Slovenian appliance engineering — European manufacturing rather than Chinese alternatives
- Lightweight at 1.8kg — easy to carry between rooms
- HEPA filter captures allergens adequately for general household use
- 30-minute runtime is below average — only adequate for smaller flats
- 0.4L bin requires very frequent emptying
- Gorenje brand unknown in UK market — no established service network
Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum
- 33Kpa suction is exceptionally high for the price bracket
- Touch LED display shows battery, mode and maintenance alerts
- Anti-tangle V-shaped brush design reduces hair wrapping
- 60-minute runtime from a removable battery
- HEPA filtration captures fine allergens
- Proscenic brand newer with less established UK service
- Build quality less premium than Dyson or Shark
- Touch display occasionally over-sensitive
FAQ
Which is better, Gorenje SVC252FBK or Proscenic P12?
Both are strong choices, but the Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.2/10. 33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless. That said, the Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum is worth considering if 22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless.
Is the Gorenje SVC252FBK worth the extra cost?
The Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.
Who is the Gorenje SVC252FBK best suited to?
22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless.
Who is the Proscenic P12 best suited to?
33Kpa, touch display, anti-tangle, 60min removable battery, HEPA. The high-suction value cordless.
What are the main downsides of each?
Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum: 30-minute runtime is below average — only adequate for smaller flats; 0.4L bin requires very frequent emptying. Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum: Proscenic brand newer with less established UK service; Build quality less premium than Dyson or Shark.
Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?
Largely, yes — Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.1★ from 2,800 verified Amazon owners, and Proscenic P12 Cordless Vacuum at 4.4★ from 6,400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.
Popular in Cordless Vacuums
Also Worth Considering
Dyson V15 Detect Absolute Cordless Vacuum
Laser reveals dust, piezo sensor counts particles, 60-min runtime, HEPA. The most advanced cordless.
Read Full Review →
Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum
25% wider head, 120-min XL battery, 0.77L bin, 220AW suction. Dyson for large homes.
Read Full Review →
Dyson V11 Absolute Cordless Vacuum
The sweet spot in the Dyson range. 60-minute battery, auto floor detection, dynamic load sensor.
Read Full Review →