Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum vs Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum

8.2/10 Very Good

4.1★ (2,800 owners)

22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless.

Full Review

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

8.7/10 Great

4.3★ (5,600 owners)

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum	Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum
247Verdict Score	8.2/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.1★ (2,800)	4.3★ (5,600)
Verdict	Very Good	Great
Runtime	30 minutes	65 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.7/10 vs 8.2/10. Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry. That said, the Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum is worth considering if 22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum

Under £80 — one of the most affordable European-brand cordless vacuums
Detachable 2-in-1 for stairs and above-floor cleaning without separate tools
Gorenje's Slovenian appliance engineering — European manufacturing rather than Chinese alternatives
Lightweight at 1.8kg — easy to carry between rooms
HEPA filter captures allergens adequately for general household use

30-minute runtime is below average — only adequate for smaller flats
0.4L bin requires very frequent emptying
Gorenje brand unknown in UK market — no established service network

Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum

360° suction nozzle reaches all corners and edges without attachment changes
Wet mop pad attaches to base for simultaneous vacuuming and mopping
65-minute runtime is above average for a combined wet-dry cordless
PowerCyclone 8 technology maintains suction as the bin fills
Philips' appliance engineering heritage applied to wet-dry cordless format

Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use
Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro
Philips cordless range less marketed in UK than Dyson or Shark

FAQ

Which is better, Gorenje SVC252FBK or Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua?

Is the Gorenje SVC252FBK worth the extra cost?

The Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum matches or exceeds it at a potentially lower price point.

Who is the Gorenje SVC252FBK best suited to?

22.2V, 30 min, detachable handheld, 0.4L, Slovenian engineering. European budget cordless.

Who is the Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua best suited to?

Vacuum + mop combo, 360° suction nozzle, 65 min, SpeedPro PowerCyclone. Philips wet-dry.

What are the main downsides of each?

Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum: 30-minute runtime is below average — only adequate for smaller flats; 0.4L bin requires very frequent emptying. Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum: Mop pad requires frequent wringing and cleaning during use; Less mopping pressure than dedicated floor cleaners like Tineco S7 Pro.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Gorenje SVC252FBK Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.1★ from 2,800 verified Amazon owners, and Philips SpeedPro Max Aqua Cordless Vacuum at 4.3★ from 5,600.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.