Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum

8.8/10 Great

4.5★ (31,400 owners)

The entry point to Dyson performance. Ideal for hard floors, smaller homes, and a secondary vacuum.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.8/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (31,400)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	40 min (normal) / 10 min (Max)	45 minutes
Weight	2.61kg	3.1kg
Warranty	2 years	5 years (Shark)

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.8/10 vs 8.6/10. The entry point to Dyson performance. Ideal for hard floors, smaller homes, and a secondary vacuum. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum

40-minute runtime handles most small-to-medium homes on a single charge
115 AW suction is genuinely strong for hard floors and rugs
Motorised brush bar for pet hair on upholstery
Converts to handheld in seconds — stairs and car cleaning
Proven reliability — the most sold cordless vacuum in the UK

Only 10 minutes on Max mode — not suitable for heavy carpet use
Older generation motor — V11/V15 are meaningfully more powerful
Bin capacity is smaller than newer models — more frequent emptying

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Dyson V8 Animal or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Dyson V8 Animal worth the extra cost?

Yes — Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 8.8/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Dyson V8 Animal best suited to?

The entry point to Dyson performance. Ideal for hard floors, smaller homes, and a secondary vacuum.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum: Only 10 minutes on Max mode — not suitable for heavy carpet use; Older generation motor — V11/V15 are meaningfully more powerful. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Dyson V8 Animal Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 31,400 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.