Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum

8.8/10 Great

4.5★ (22,400 owners)

115 AW suction, 40 min, Torque drive head, HEPA filtration. The classic Dyson cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (9,200 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless
247Verdict Score	8.8/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (22,400)	4.4★ (9,200)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	40 minutes	80 minutes (2 batteries)
Head	Torque Drive	DuoClean
Filter	HEPA	Non-HEPA

Quick Verdict

This is a genuine draw — both score within 0.15 points of each other. Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum: 115 AW suction, 40 min, Torque drive head, HEPA filtration. The classic Dyson cordless. Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless. Choose based on your specific needs. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum

115AW suction — less than V12/V15 but substantially more than entry cordless vacuums
Dyson Torque Drive head agitates carpet fibres for deep dust extraction
40-minute runtime adequate for most medium-sized UK homes
HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of particles — allergy-safe cleaning
22,400 Amazon reviews at 4.5★ — one of the most validated cordless vacuums available

Less suction than V12/V15 — for large homes or heavy soiling, the V12 is significantly better
No laser detection — V12 and V15 have this feature
Older generation — V12 and V15 have measurably better performance

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

Anti Hair Wrap removes pet and human hair from brush roll automatically — Shark's signature feature
80-minute runtime from two detachable batteries — longest of any Shark cordless
Flexology wand bends 90° to clean under furniture without stooping
DuoClean head with two brush rolls handles both hard floors and carpet in one pass
Under £200 — Shark's anti-tangle technology at the most accessible Shark price

Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off
Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime
No HEPA filtration — dust release on bin emptying is less clean than HEPA alternatives

FAQ

Which is better, Dyson V8 Absolute or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT?

Is the Dyson V8 Absolute worth the extra cost?

Yes — Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 8.8/10 vs 8.7/10.

Who is the Dyson V8 Absolute best suited to?

115 AW suction, 40 min, Torque drive head, HEPA filtration. The classic Dyson cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum: Less suction than V12/V15 — for large homes or heavy soiling, the V12 is significantly better; No laser detection — V12 and V15 have this feature. Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off; Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 22,400 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless at 4.4★ from 9,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.