Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum

8.8/10 Great

4.5★ (22,400 owners)

115 AW suction, 40 min, Torque drive head, HEPA filtration. The classic Dyson cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.8/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (22,400)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	40 minutes	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 8.8/10 vs 8.6/10. 115 AW suction, 40 min, Torque drive head, HEPA filtration. The classic Dyson cordless. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum

115AW suction — less than V12/V15 but substantially more than entry cordless vacuums
Dyson Torque Drive head agitates carpet fibres for deep dust extraction
40-minute runtime adequate for most medium-sized UK homes
HEPA filtration captures 99.97% of particles — allergy-safe cleaning
22,400 Amazon reviews at 4.5★ — one of the most validated cordless vacuums available

Less suction than V12/V15 — for large homes or heavy soiling, the V12 is significantly better
No laser detection — V12 and V15 have this feature
Older generation — V12 and V15 have measurably better performance

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Dyson V8 Absolute or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Dyson V8 Absolute worth the extra cost?

Yes — Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 8.8/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Dyson V8 Absolute best suited to?

115 AW suction, 40 min, Torque drive head, HEPA filtration. The classic Dyson cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum: Less suction than V12/V15 — for large homes or heavy soiling, the V12 is significantly better; No laser detection — V12 and V15 have this feature. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Dyson V8 Absolute Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 22,400 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.