Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum

9.2/10 Excellent

4.5★ (3,800 owners)

25% wider head, 120-min XL battery, 0.77L bin, 220AW suction. Dyson for large homes.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

8.7/10 Great

4.4★ (9,200 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless
247Verdict Score	9.2/10	8.7/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (3,800)	4.4★ (9,200)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Head	25% wider	DuoClean
Runtime	120 minutes XL battery	80 minutes (2 batteries)
Filter	HEPA sealed	Non-HEPA

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 9.2/10 vs 8.7/10. 25% wider head, 120-min XL battery, 0.77L bin, 220AW suction. Dyson for large homes. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum

25% wider floor head covers more floor area per pass — reduces cleaning time in large rooms
120-minute runtime from XL battery — doubles standard Dyson run time for very large homes
0.77L bin is larger than standard Dyson vacuums — fewer empties per session
220AW suction is among the highest of any Dyson cordless
HEPA filtration with fully-sealed system captures allergens throughout

Wider head is less manoeuvrable in tight spaces and around furniture legs
Heavier at 3.5kg — more tiring for extended cleaning sessions
Premium pricing at the top of the Dyson cordless range

Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless

Anti Hair Wrap removes pet and human hair from brush roll automatically — Shark's signature feature
80-minute runtime from two detachable batteries — longest of any Shark cordless
Flexology wand bends 90° to clean under furniture without stooping
DuoClean head with two brush rolls handles both hard floors and carpet in one pass
Under £200 — Shark's anti-tangle technology at the most accessible Shark price

Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off
Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime
No HEPA filtration — dust release on bin emptying is less clean than HEPA alternatives

FAQ

Which is better, Dyson Outsize Absolute or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT?

Is the Dyson Outsize Absolute worth the extra cost?

Yes — Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 9.2/10 vs 8.7/10.

Who is the Dyson Outsize Absolute best suited to?

25% wider head, 120-min XL battery, 0.77L bin, 220AW suction. Dyson for large homes.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap, 80 min, Flexology wand, DuoClean. Shark's best-value cordless.

What are the main downsides of each?

Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum: Wider head is less manoeuvrable in tight spaces and around furniture legs; Heavier at 3.5kg — more tiring for extended cleaning sessions. Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless: Less suction power than Stratos IZ420UKT — the anti-tangle feature comes at a suction trade-off; Two batteries require both to be charged for full 80-minute runtime.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 3,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UKT Cordless at 4.4★ from 9,200.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.