Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum

9.2/10 Excellent

4.5★ (3,800 owners)

25% wider head, 120-min XL battery, 0.77L bin, 220AW suction. Dyson for large homes.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	9.2/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.5★ (3,800)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Excellent	Great
Runtime	120 minutes XL battery	45 minutes
Weight	3.5kg	3.1kg

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum edges ahead with a 9.2/10 vs 8.6/10. 25% wider head, 120-min XL battery, 0.77L bin, 220AW suction. Dyson for large homes. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum

25% wider floor head covers more floor area per pass — reduces cleaning time in large rooms
120-minute runtime from XL battery — doubles standard Dyson run time for very large homes
0.77L bin is larger than standard Dyson vacuums — fewer empties per session
220AW suction is among the highest of any Dyson cordless
HEPA filtration with fully-sealed system captures allergens throughout

Wider head is less manoeuvrable in tight spaces and around furniture legs
Heavier at 3.5kg — more tiring for extended cleaning sessions
Premium pricing at the top of the Dyson cordless range

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Dyson Outsize Absolute or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Dyson Outsize Absolute worth the extra cost?

Yes — Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum scores higher at 9.2/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Dyson Outsize Absolute best suited to?

25% wider head, 120-min XL battery, 0.77L bin, 220AW suction. Dyson for large homes.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum: Wider head is less manoeuvrable in tight spaces and around furniture legs; Heavier at 3.5kg — more tiring for extended cleaning sessions. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Dyson Outsize Absolute Cordless Vacuum sits at 4.5★ from 3,800 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.