Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet & Dry Cordless Cleaner vs Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK (2026)

✍️ By the 247Verdict Editorial Team📅 Updated 05 October 2026

Which is better? We compared both on score, owner ratings, pros and cons.

Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet & Dry Cordless Cleaner

8.9/10 Great

4.4★ (4,200 owners)

Vacuums + mops simultaneously, self-cleaning, 25min, sealed hard floors. The wet-and-dry cordless.

Full Review

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

8.6/10 Great

4.4★ (22,100 owners)

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

Full Review

At a Glance

	Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet & Dry Cordless Cleaner	Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK
247Verdict Score	8.9/10	8.6/10
Owner Rating	4.4★ (4,200)	4.4★ (22,100)
Verdict	Great	Great
Runtime	25 min	45 minutes

Quick Verdict

Both are strong choices, but the Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet & Dry Cordless Cleaner edges ahead with a 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10. Vacuums + mops simultaneously, self-cleaning, 25min, sealed hard floors. The wet-and-dry cordless. That said, the Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK is worth considering if Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson. Check the current price on Amazon →

Pros & Cons Side by Side

Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet & Dry Cordless Cleaner

Vacuums and mops sealed hard floors simultaneously — picks up dry debris and wet spills in one pass
Self-cleaning cycle flushes the brush roll and tubes with clean water automatically
Two-tank system keeps clean and dirty water separate for hygienic mopping
Cordless freedom for whole-home hard floor cleaning
Ideal for kitchens, bathrooms and homes with lots of sealed hard flooring

Hard floors only — not for carpets unlike traditional cordless vacuums
25-minute runtime limited for very large homes
Heavier and requires water tank refilling

Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK

Anti Hair Wrap genuinely works — hair is separated and collected, not tangled round the brush
DuoClean PowerFins engages hard floors and carpets simultaneously — no attachment changes
45-minute runtime is strong for the price class
Flexology wand bends flat to clean under furniture without attachment change
Significantly cheaper than equivalent Dyson models

Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode
Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L
HEPA filtration not available on base model — check which version you're buying

FAQ

Which is better, Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet or Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK?

Is the Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet worth the extra cost?

Yes — Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet & Dry Cordless Cleaner scores higher at 8.9/10 vs 8.6/10.

Who is the Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet best suited to?

Vacuums + mops simultaneously, self-cleaning, 25min, sealed hard floors. The wet-and-dry cordless.

Who is the Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320UK best suited to?

Anti Hair Wrap technology untangles hair from the brush as it works. The honest alternative to Dyson.

What are the main downsides of each?

Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet & Dry Cordless Cleaner: Hard floors only — not for carpets unlike traditional cordless vacuums; 25-minute runtime limited for very large homes. Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK: Suction is weaker than Dyson V11 on max carpet mode; Bin is smaller than Dyson V11 at 0.7L vs 0.76L.

Do owner ratings agree with our verdict?

Largely, yes — Bissell CrossWave X7 Wet & Dry Cordless Cleaner sits at 4.4★ from 4,200 verified Amazon owners, and Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless IZ320UK at 4.4★ from 22,100.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.